Of course if you just want your privacy violated, you don’t need the NSA.

Taken this past winter, at a time without snow.

Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop shooting down small planes.

Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop shooting down small planes.

indecent-exposure

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Of course if you just want your privacy violated, you don’t need the NSA.

  1. KA9VSZ says:

    I have entertained myself by using the time slider to observe changes in the neighborhood. I can tell which neighbor was home when by which cars are in which lot (we have more than one). We even found a cheating significant other. Ain’t technology great? I’d be better if MY car weren’t in every damn picture…

  2. Joel says:

    You must get updated a lot more often than we do. I guess that would make sense. For reasons of bandwidth and aggravation I don’t spend much time with Google Earth and this is only the second update I’m sure of since I first screwed with it, though it may happen a little more often. So it hasn’t inadvertently caught any of our [joke redacted].

  3. KA9VSZ says:

    I have sufficient free bandwidth that I waste a lot on time on-line. And, who says my [redacted joke] was caught inadvertently? Ha. Apparently, some people make a hobby of sorts out of attempting to get socially verboten stuff photographed by the google cars. I wonder how big a grove of trees would have to be for google to see a message from the planes or satellites. Hmm. A long-term project, I suspect.

  4. Joel says:

    I dunno, but when I was planning to shingle the Lair instead of using the big red sheets I had definite plans for a middle-finger salute symbol right in the middle. Now I wish I had.

  5. LJH says:

    You could still paint one up there.

  6. Joel says:

    And I may yet.

  7. Tam says:

    Wait, wait, wait… I thought Photography Is Not A Crime! Radley Balko told me so!

    😉

  8. Roberta X says:

    Photobombing Is Not A Crime, Either. 🙂

  9. Joel says:

    May not be a crime, but it’s damned annoying when I’ve gone to this much trouble to get some privacy.

  10. Tam says:

    May not be a crime, but it’s damned annoying when I’ve gone to this much trouble to get some privacy.

    Sadly, I fear the notions of what exactly constitutes “privacy” are undergoing radical changes. Maybe some asteroid miner in the future will have a measure of it, but I don’t know I’d bet on it.

  11. Joel says:

    Sadly, I fear you’re correct on all counts.

    Although I’m happy to say that Ian’s place (not in frame on the pic I posted) appears to be almost invisible from the air. If it weren’t for the solar panels…

  12. Pingback: I’m keeping LB under cover until further notice… | The Ultimate Answer to Kings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *