Or why I will never have a discussion about NAP with ANYBODY EVER EVER EVER, no matter when or where, no matter who, I don’t care if Friedrich August von Hayek shows up at my door with a bottle of good rye and wants to shoot the shit, if NAP comes up I’m throwing his long-dead ass right the hell out of the Lair and keeping the booze,
(deep breath)
That is all.
















































it’s like saying “Betelgeuse” three times.
You’ve written “NAP” twice already.
If anyone else writes it, it’ll be open season…
Oh sh!te!
did I just write “NAP”?
😉
next thing you’ll have that inane troll of anarchist sites “git” showing up.
Read the linked post. No idea what he was going on about. Glad not to be a libertarian (big of little l) or adherent of the,principle that shall not be named.
Looks like the same mindset is after Balko, too. 🙂
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/07/16/mistakes-were-made-by-me/
And I dunno about eschewing the topic entirely, Joel. Seems to me the potential amusement value is still fairly compelling.
Striving for a principle is great, but purity crusades (and the Newtonian Third Law phenomenon from which it is not exempt) are just ironic evidence of You’re-Doing-It-Wrong.
Joel;
One quibble – them fellers you linked to were anarchists, not libertarians.
There is a difference.
Mainly, there is a lot less stupid coming out of the libertarians. And all of that was stupid.