They say that Louis XIV had the inscription Ultima Ratio Regum cast into all the cannon of the French Army. It means “The Ultimate Argument of Kings,” and that always struck me as one of the most honest and up-front things any ruler or would-be ruler ever said. “We can dress it up prettier than this, but when it comes down to the unvarnished truth this is what it’s about: You’ll do as I say or I’ll send my goons to kill you.”
I thought about that for a long time. If there’s an ultimate argument, it seems only logical that there must be an ultimate answer. For years I thought the ultimate answer must be the bullets in my rifle, but it never seemed quite right. I’ve got bullets – he’s got frigging Cannon Balls. I mean, if there were three hundred million rifles throwing bullets at him, then maybe. But we all know that’s not going to happen. So if there’s an ultimate answer to his ultimate argument, it sure as hell ain’t bullets.
It finally came to me – and that’s when I abandoned the city and most of my stuff, and gave all that was behind me a good stiff Randian Shrug.
The ultimate answer to kings is not a bullet, but a belly laugh.
I can see falling asleep if the speech was simply boring, wine or not, but it’s hard to imagine being able to listen to the liar in chief passively. I’m afraid I’d have to be physically restrained from climbing to the podium and smacking his face.
Can’t imagine why she doesn’t just stay home.
Hell, she’s on his side. The article says Scalia has stayed home for years.
Make me Ginsburg’s age, feed me wine along with a hearty supper, and then make me sit through any State-Of-the Union speech (from any President), and I guarantee similar unconsciousness. Like Scalia, I don’t know why any of the Justices show up for that sad TV spectacle. After all, they’re not running for office!
Ben: Dunno ’bout Ginsburg, but I bet the guys attend to show off their black dresses er, robes. SOTU would be a lot more interesting if everybody showed up slightly buzzed. Heh. With mandatory heckling of the Prez.
Oh, I know she’s happy with Obummer’s crap. The point is that, at her age, I’d not think she’d want to be seen as a droopy old lady who couldn’t even stay awake to hear wonderf boy speak.
And what IS that stupid thing she has around her neck? Always makes me think she’s in a nightgown. LOL
…eh, that stray f was a pure typo, not an abreviated bad word – as much as it would fit. LOL
There have been several reports of her dozing off while hearing cases at SCOTUS.for several years now. Scotusblog has reported it among others.
Well obviously, Joe in Reno, she doesn’t need to HEAR the presentation of any case before the court, since she can tell from the subject of the case and the identity of the opposing parties what decision will be correct.
May she soon burn in hell where she belongs, along with almost everyone else in that damnable “institution”.