…hesitantly raises hand…

It is absolutely mind boggling that these government pond scum hacks can get away with reporting that 484,000 people who WERE unemployed last month are no longer unemployed this month. Life is so f***ing good in this country, they all just decided to kick back and leave the labor force. Maybe they all won the Powerball lottery. How many people do you know who can afford to just leave the workforce and live off their vast savings?

Of course I dropped out during the Bush admin – and started having employment trouble in the Clinton admin – so technically it’s not Obama’s fault*. As far as I know it’s not Clinton or Bush’s fault, but I never had a really good grasp on what went wrong so I suppose it could be. Maybe they had it in for me personally, after all just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you…

(ahem) Which isn’t the point of the linked article at all, I just suffered a minor flashback. What time is it? Oh! Geez, how’d that happen? Better get going here…

Goebbels and Bernays are smiling up from the fires of hell as their acolytes of propaganda have kicked it into hyper-drive. We only need the other 7.4 million “officially” unemployed Americans to leave the work force and we’ll have 0% unemployment. At the current pace we should be there by election time. I wonder if Cramer, Liesman, or any of the other CNBC mouthpieces for the establishment will point out that not one single full-time job has been added in 2016. There were 6,000 less full-time jobs in May than in January, while there are 572,000 more low paying, no benefits, part-time Obama service jobs. Sounds like a recovery to me.

So rejoice, America! Because…


*According to the Obama Rule of Culpability, though, it will start being Obama’s fault at the very moment the next bastard is sworn in.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to …hesitantly raises hand…

  1. MJR says:

    The last two masters-in-chief you guys have had haven’t been shiny examples for the rest of the world. Even Conrad Black has noticed this.

    http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/conrad-black-obama-will-be-neck-and-neck-with-g-w-bush-as-the-most-incompetent-u-s-president-of-our-time

  2. Bear says:

    Black may be forgetting Carter.

  3. Joel says:

    😀 I thought exactly the same thing, but he redeems the blunder slightly in the body of the text by claiming Bush and Obama are the worst prezes in [some period] to be re-elected.

  4. Ben says:

    Bear wrote: “Black may be forgetting Carter.” Carter is an interesting case. I believe that he was the most ineffective President of my lifetime, but apparently not a bad human being. Therefore, he is the only ex-President that I wouldn’t mind actually meeting.

    (Note that my criteria was “most ineffective” and not “worst”. For “worst” my choice would be a tossup between Nixon and Bush. The world might have been a better place had those two been a little less effective, particularly where it comes to killing people.)

  5. Robert Evans says:

    If Hillary is elected, Obama won’t be blamed – – she’ll blame the Republican Congress. Trump will, of course, treat Obama the way Obama treated Bush.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *