According to this Medical Daily article, (WARNING: extremely annoying autoplay ads which cannot be permanently paused or muted cause frustration and violent ideation in white American males) we creepy-ass crackers can no longer hide our racist leanings through mere lies thanks to the wonders of a statistical concept known as Symbolic Racism.
Symbolic racism is less obvious than blatant or overt racism. It deals more with attitudes than actions, suggestions instead of slurs. The blatant racism of Jim Crow laws, which relegated blacks to the backs of buses and subjected them to many other inequalities, have been replaced, the researchers assert, by more discreet forms of discrimination. These are reflected in wide support for policies that statistically hinder blacks, such as longer prison sentences, and opposition to programs that may benefit them, such as welfare.
Judging racism can be tricky, as it lends itself to interpretation quite frequently. Researchers formulated questions that they believed illuminated racist attitudes in respondents.
This vile bias which lies latent in the breast of every white male American relates directly to his attitude toward gun ownership.
For every one point increase in symbolic racism — measured on a five-point scale — the chance someone had a gun in the home rose by 50 percent, and the chance the respondent supported policies that allowed people to carry concealed guns rose by 28 percent.
It doesn’t matter where you come from, or what your political affiliation or attitude toward the government. If you’re in favor of gun ownership, you’re a racist.
Conservatism, anti-government sentiment, party identification, being from a southern state, were also associated with opposition to gun controls, but the association between racism and the gun-related outcomes remained after accounting for these factors and other participant characteristics (age, education, income, gender).
See? It says so right there, so it must be true.
But why has this vital knowledge only come to light at this late date?
“We were initially surprised that no one had studied this issue before,” said study co-author Dr. Dermot Lynott, from Lancaster University, in a statement. “However, the U.S. government cut research funding for gun-related research over decade and a half ago, so research in this area has been somewhat suppressed.”
I searched in vain for the phrase “Centers for Disease Control,” but I swear I can smell their money in there somewhere.
The national origin of the authors adds a layer of smug Britishness, contributing to the study’s authority.
“Coming from countries with strong gun control policies, and a 30-fold lower rate of gun-related homicides, we found the arguments for opposing gun control counterintuitive and somewhat illogical,” said co-author Dr. Kerry O’Brien, from the University of Manchester and Monash University, two British universities that, along with Lynott’s research headquarters, reside in a country where 6.2 people per 100,000 own a gun.
I, for one, welcome our new unarmed and helpless overlords.
What drives this irrational urge for gun ownership? An equally irrational desire for freedom. Says so right here:
“Why would you keep them? So we decided to examine what social and psychological factors predict gun ownership and opposition to gun control.”
Part of the answer is simply freedom. Americans whose family is steeped in the traditions of southern conservatism tend to enjoy exercising their second amendment Constitutional right.
So you see, freedom is racist. Or something.
H/T to Sipsey Street.

















































What’s with this blatant prejudice for “American white males?” Us females fit the same profile rather well very often – and in fact, increasing exponentially. Yeah, freedom. And I’m an equal opportunity freedom/gun owner. Anyone attacking me gets shot, regardless of race, religion, creed or national origin.
Mama Liberty for president.
Well, thanks LJH… but the problem is I have about all I can manage to be “president” of me and my household. Heck… even the dog won’t mind me half the time. LOL
Afraid everyone else will just have to fend for themselves. 🙂
Shit, I guess that makes me a one man klan meeting.
Hmmm…I wonder how these limey kidney pie eating fem-boys(all these Brit intellectual types look gay to me) will explain to me how my wife is a racist white male. She does own a few guns. She is very proudly Asian, racist and female. Also, I was at the range last night. There was a Filipino and his equally not white wife. ‘Splain it to them.
Maybe they can also explain it to my shooting buddy. Iranian….. of course Iranians qualify being caucasian and all…… but try telling an Iranian that and he will defend his ethnicity as distinctly Iranian….which means white racist in denial. What are we to do with the annoyingly smart Chinese guy we met there at the range last week who was test firing his fresh off the CNC(which HE PROGRAMMED) AR15? He is uber white racist. Makes his OWN guns. And he can’t jump or dance. So we know he is White despite the cleverly epicanthic eye folds he uses as a disguise. We see you in there Joe Billy Bob…you ain’t foolin’ none with that yellow skin…….
Who stole the rest of the guns out of my living room?!
Oh well, This white gun owning Brit, is off to visit a fellow gun owner who’s of Chinese origin, for Sunday lunch.
Does the correlation also apply to gun owners who aren’t quite so pale skinned as I am? or is vat a waycist questun?
I’m not sure whether he has more rythm than I’ve got; perhaps I should use one of my guns to chase the Joooos out of my family tree, that might cure my lack of rythm, or would vat be waycist too?