Information, like me, wants to be free.

I’ve been following this with what could fairly be described as fascination. Remember the old myth about Allied airmen dropping single-shot weapons from planes over occupied France?

Why go to all that trouble when you can sent them through telephone lines?

I wonder how close to real it really is? And what the price of 3-D printers will come down to?

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Information, like me, wants to be free.

  1. Anonymous says:

    Hear that? That’s the sound of a paradigm shifting. Sarah Brady kiss my ass.

  2. Bear says:

    The Liberator pistol isn’t exactly a myth. A hell of a lot were manufactured. I was under the impression that none had actually been distributed though, but Wikipedia claims a handful got passed out in the Philippines. Very few Liberators still exist since the government decided that a single-shot “disposable” gun intended to resist governments is too dangeroud and destroyed all they could get their paws on.

    The wiki weapon is an interesting concept, but if I had ten grand laying around, I’d probably just buy a hell of a lot of conventional firearms and ammunition.

    From a technical standpoint… Well, I can’t access most of their site, so criticizing the technical issues is going to be tough. All I can tell is that they plan to build something chambered in .22LR, completely in thermosetting plastic. Presumably it’ll be a single-shot, or the thermosetting barrel would melt and wear (although one site comment suggests that they think .22LR doesn’t generate heat). In which case, there are a lot of simpler, cheaper, less-obvious-to-the-authorities options already available. Think zipgun. The old DF! magazine had an article on how to build a single-shot 12 ga. shotgun from rolled up magazines.

    If you’re going to spend thousands of dollars so you can whip out a computer-generated gun instead of having one on hand (and how do they plAn to “print” ammo?), why not go with CNC…

    Ah, I see MJR kindly provided a link to CNC files for real firearms. Point made.

    Basically, these guys don’t really look serious. They’re just getting folks to fund their hobby. More power to ’em.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Bear, I think you are missing the point somewhat. As I see it, this is a research and development project. At some point 3D printers will probably be able to use high strength materials. Jumping straight from a concept to finished project is nice if you can do it but usually there are intermediate steps. I remember the first PC hard drive I encountered. All of 10 mb! A terabyte was so inconceivable one would have been ridiculed for even dreaming about it.

    I see 3D printing as the next great thing to come down the technology pipeline. The first functional printed firearm will certainly be crude by later standards. I’m betting there will be amazing things come out of research into 3D printing. Hold on tight, I feel that paradigm starting to shift!

  4. Bear says:

    @Anon 11:12,

    I’m not missing the point. From what I can tell from their web site (maybe it works better in Internet Exploder, but Firefox couldn’t load much more than their… [pardon the term] _FAQ_), they don’t seem to know much about firearms, ammunition, or the _already existing_ pro-level 3D printers using ceramic and metallic dusts, which are much likely to produce a firearm that won’t blow up in your hand (https://www.google.com/search?q=3d+printing+with+ceramic+dust), ior even already existing CNC. For that matter, they don’t seem to know that people have been making real repeating firearms _by hand_ for rather a long time.

    The specified ABSplus polymer they want to use would probably be good for producing “lost wax” castings for gun parts, but not for anything much sturdier than a cellblock zipgun. In which case, they might want to experiment with making those castings using low melting point metals that folks can scrape up in their homes and cast without the usual metal shop tools (I do a little of that myself, and would rather fire a gun made from some of my zinc alloy stuff than a fused-particle thermosetting plastic… and I’ve seen some scary-cheap-but-commercially-manufactured pot metal handguns already).

    Repeat: These guys are just hobbyists looking for someone to _voluntarily_ fund their hobby. Nothing wrong with that. I wish I’d had as much luck as them.

    3D printing is already important. It will become more so. But by the time most folks have a 3D printer on their desks to routine print household items, any files these guys produce for thermoplastic will be next to useless for real guns. I’d expect CNC files (meant for metals) to port over better.

  5. Buck. says:

    Barring some ridiculous and unfortunately likely legislation I think those is doable. Probably more so if someone starts passing laws. Some people just love to rub the politicos noses in the shit that pass. Applauded in advance. There’s already the one guy who printed an AR receiver and hooked up the .22lr upper. There’s another guy on youtube with a CNC milled Derlin (Delrin?) lower he says she has fired using a .22lr upper.
    I can’t imagine it would be too hard to make all manner of firearms out of this technology. How the hell would regulators stop it?

    Screw it all anyway. I want a laser like they have on the Mars Rover.

  6. Ian says:

    Damn. Joel, you beat me to it. I have an email in to the fellow to clear up a couple basic questions first before I post it to Forgotten Weapons (like, what is the yield strength of the ABS?)

    Carl, I think you’re missing a big part of the point. It’s only partly about the gun, and as much about the free speech principle of making this sort of ready-to-use data freely and universally accessible.

  7. Joel says:

    Yeah. The way I see it, if 3-D printers become even slightly as ubiquitous (and cheap?) as computer printers, guns will be about as impossible to ban as kittens. You can always make more!

    Also, I’m aware the Liberator isn’t a myth because I’ve seen one. The story that they were actually spread through the Third Reich is a myth.

  8. Matt says:

    I see this as a grand opportunity, possibly mated with some basic CNC machines to produce some of the weapons we’ve seen on Forgotten Weapons. Maybe the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle, or one of the Polish subgun designs. The Mauser last ditch pistol posted a day or two ago could be a prime example.

  9. Bear says:

    (Damn it, Joel. Your host is screwing with my posting again.)

    Ian: “Carl, I think you’re missing a big part of the point. It’s only partly about the gun, and as much about the free speech principle of making this sort of ready-to-use data freely and universally accessible.”

    See MJR’s link to the already-existing _free_ CNC data files. The _information_ is already out there, and more every day.

    Right now, saying that ABS 3D printing of firearms or any other banned device is about free speech is… let me find a good example.

    There was a time when a common SF theme was that _television_ would make universal education and information disemination possible. That turned out not to be the case because television is a centralized (and thus controllable– just ask the FCC) media. Instead, an entirely different technology is doing the trick: the Internet; particularly with people creating open wifi nodes and do-it-yourself Internet backbones (https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+convert+a+router+for+internet+links). Similar claims were made for pirate broadcast radio; while people did it for quite a while, it just isn’t the preferred mode for reaching a lot of people anymore.

    3D printing is still pretty new. But ABS plastic printers aren’t the technology that will really do the job. It’s good for a few things that don’t require much strength, prototyping stuff dimensionally, or creating lost wax casting molds. The printers that will eventually let you print a gun (or working cell phone) will inject streams of multiple elements at higher temperatures. Those printers (we’re seeing the beginnings already with the ceramic/metallic dust commercial models) will bear the same resemblance to today’s ABS plastic printers as a Android smart phone does to the telegraph. Any files designed for a hobbyist plastic printer will be about as useful to the future printers as using Skype to call a bud on his smart phone to say, “dah-dah, di-di-dit, da-di-dah.*” Or building a modern web site by plugging old Compuserve 8 bit GIFs into an interactive Flash presentation. You _could_, but why, other than as a curiosity?

    Current 3D printing is cool. It can do neat stuff. I wish I had one. But it isn’t the technology that’s going to save the world from tyranny, unless you want to consider the telegraph the same tech as wifi’d Internet.

    RE: ABS strength. I’ll keep an eye on your site to see what the guy tells you. While I understand commercial ceramic models have successfully printed engine blocks, the base material there is stronger and fused at much higher temperatures (and assembled with a different technique — dust blown into an aerogel matrix, I think). Last time I looked into this, the ABS units essentially sinter thermosetting plastic powder, giving a mass with less structural strength than blow-molded HDPE (a thought which brings back old — unpleasant — memories of working the factory floor).

    I sort of get more excited by the computer-driven laser cutters. You want a gun? Cut out the sections (ala L.Neil Smith’s _Pallas_ Ngu Departure) and screw them together. Thinking on old welded-bar cannon, I suspect you _might_ even be able to build your barrel that way.

    (* I don’t know code. If that actually means anything, I’ll be as astonished as you.)

  10. Ian says:

    Those CNC files are helpful and generous, but they are simply blueprints. A printable gun data file would be machine code ready to go, I presume. With a CNC solid model, you still have to build your jigs, determine cutting tools, speeds, and feeds, and program tool paths into your machine (not a trivial set of tasks for a novice). They are a very helpful first step for a machine operator, but not a plug-n-play solution for the untrained person.

  11. I just read an article last week where someone’s working on plans (i.e. – raising funds – I’m sure) to build houses with 3-D printer methods – on site, to scale – minus windows and doors and internals like plumbing, electrical, HVAC.

    Me – I’ll stick with the shipping containers for now!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *