I don’t testify to this thing’s accuracy.

I got it off a progressive site, which means it’s probably a lie. But if true, and I still depended on conventional “employment,” I’d find it chilling.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to I don’t testify to this thing’s accuracy.

  1. Unemployment or just folks who have migrated to the underground economy?

    Our new taxes here are said to have bred a multi Billion dollar underground economy, that is just in the province of Ontario. Government is currently asking neighbours to turn in their neighbours who are not carrying their fair share of the weight. Not toooo much of that happening as if you pay under the table you save about 20% minimum. 15% off the top in prov and fed taxes and more in pay roll taxes that the employers/employees don’t have to pay out.

    Its a win win for everyone but the government..win win all the way.

  2. Joel says:

    Unemployment or just folks who have migrated to the underground economy?

    Heh. Well, yeah. There’s that. ;^)

    Yet I do wonder how many people – as a percentage of the whole – really go that route. Me, I’ve never had the right attitude to make a good citizen, even when I tried. But it seems to me an awful lot of people would be shocked at the thought of opting out of the consumer/employee/taxpayer box, if the thought ever even occurred to them, and will piss away their resources rather than go freelance.

  3. Tam says:

    That animation is accurate enough. It’s the latest update of one that’s been running around various financial sites for over a year now and it’s been picked up and used by everyone from doomers to pinkos to support their pet theories.

    “Double Dip” my lilly-white arse. “Single Plummet” would be more accurate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *