Indentured servitude as municipal policy

Courtesy of your friend and mine, Professor Robert Reich

One way to view Detroit’s bankruptcy is as a failure of political negotiations over how financial sacrifices should be divided among the city’s creditors, city workers and municipal retirees, requiring a court to decide instead.

It could also be seen as the inevitable culmination of decades of union agreements offering unaffordable pension and health benefits to city workers.

But there’s a more basic story here, and it’s being replicated across America: Americans are segregating by income more than ever before.

Much in modern America depends on where you draw boundaries, and who’s inside and who’s outside. Who is included in the social contract?

If Detroit is defined as the larger metro area that includes its suburbs, it has enough money to provide all its residents with adequate if not good public services, without falling into bankruptcy. It would come down to a question of whether the more affluent areas of this Detroit were willing to subsidize the poor inner city through their tax dollars and help it rebound. That’s an awkward question that the more affluent areas would probably rather not have to face.

There’s nothing awkward about it, Prof. Reich. Those people faced the question years ago when they moved the hell away from corrupt, violent, crumbling Detroit, often abandoning homes they couldn’t sell in the process. (The last member of my immediate family to leave Detroit literally did that. Just moved out and left it to rot, because whatareyagonnado? At the end, I don’t think he bothered to lock the door.) They faced the question, and the answer was “No.”

To “redefine” the borders of Detroit so as to bring the ‘burbs under the sway of the tax vacuum is to put the suburban residents into slavery to the city residents. There’s no way to put it that’s more polite, yet still accurate. And while I’m quite sure Robert Reich sees no problem with that, good luck keepin’em down on the tax farm. You’d need a big wall and guard towers.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Indentured servitude as municipal policy

  1. Mr Galt says:

    The entire state of Michigan is already enslaved to that shithole. From “no fault” insurance, designed to redistribute risk, to the “Clean Michigan Initiative”, to the forced installation of Federal and State government buildings in the midst of the hood, we already pay our indulgences. Put a fence around it, and light it on fire.

  2. Borepatch says:

    Do the suburban residents get to vote on the city government elections? The problem of Detroit was a famously corrupt and incompetent government; removing that is the only path to any get well plan.

  3. Mr Galt says:

    @Borepatch

    The last reasonably competent mayor they had was Dennis Archer. He was even able to get business types to invest money, and was willing to work with a Republican governor to cleanup the schools. Problem was (and still is), Coleman Young’s civil service goons essentially torpedoed everything he tried to do. After Archer was Kwame the gangsta. You can vote them out, but it still doesn’t change. I’ve seen similar things at the state and federal levels with the bureaucracy. The red tape pencil pushing parasites need to be swept out en masse.

To the stake with the heretic!