I’m off to visit the new babies, if they’re still alive. Here’s some stuff to read*:
Why is the FBI taking this guy’s stuff?
Tremble, CT politicians. Some of you may soon need honest jobs. I have said, albeit reluctantly, that state and local elections aren’t always completely pointless.
Here’s a plausible explanation for what Darren Aronofsky was really up to with that weird movie about Noah.
—
* If Claire can clear her tabs this way, the practice is officially sanctioned. 🙂
















































A modern, Western Christian (a sociological set of subsets notorious for failing to get along with each other) take on a Hollyweird script assuming it has something to do with an explanation of a “secret” Jewish take on serially-interpreted millenia-old myths of lifted from a bunch of other primitive cultures by a group of self-isolated hunter-gatherers. (Parse that, suckers.)
“Plausible.”
Right! Well, it’s plausible if you don’t know anything about Gnosticism. Or Kaballah. Which I don’t.
From everything I’ve heard of it, Noah makes no sense at all as a Bible story.
The bible makes no sense at all.
Huh! Comments about what I expected so far.
But as someone who did a “minor” in college in ancient near-eastern religions, I can tell you the guy’s right. I suspect readers of this blog were not his intended audience, however, as I suspect many to most aren’t really interested in whether something conforms to the true doctrine of the (small c) catholic church.
I haven’t seen the movie, but if his descriptions of the movie are correct, then he is absolutely correct.
Here are my reasons:
1. The snake skin. If, indeed, the movie has a snake skin as a religious talisman being wielded by Hebrews, then it is Kabbalah/Gnostic symbolism, not traditional Judeo-Christian. Gnostic tradition has one of the true, luminescent, amaterial gods named Sophia attempting to create a son for herself, and finding him to be an abomination, hid him in a cloud that he could not see out of. Her son became Yahweh, the God of the Old Testament, and the God that Christians everywhere pray to, and according to Gnostic tradition, he is arrogant, ugly, cock-sure, jealous, and vengeful. Because of Yahweh’s isolation inside the cloud, he could not see out to realize that he is a lesser God among a panoply of greater beings, and therefore spent most of his existence laboring under the belief that he was the only God, the creator of all that was and will ever be. While the other, greater, more luminescent Gods snickered behind his oblivious back, Yahweh created all of the material world that we know today – the heavens and the Earth, and the animals, just like in the creation myth laid out in Genesis. The Old Testament is told from the perspective of Yahweh’s creation, by the creatures He created. Thus, the jealous, angry God of the Old Testament. This explains the commandments to hold “no other Gods before Him” and so forth, because even though he had no way of knowing that there were other Gods, he probably felt it in some way. Long item short, because the Gnostics see Yahweh as the enemy, anyone that stands against Yahweh is either seen as the good guy, or at least the enemy of my enemy. The snake in the garden of Eden is therefore generally believed by Gnostics to be either Sophia, Yahweh’s mom and the true, enlightened luminescent God, or Satan, who in the Gnostic tradition was chaotic neutral at worst, and chaotic good in some interpretations. The snake was worshipped because the eating of the fruit of knowledge was Creation’s first rebellion against the evil, jealous Yahweh.
2. The Lava Golems. Pretty much for the reasons he explained in his essay, so I won’t go into it.
Really quickly, gnostic traditions see Jesus not as the Son of Yahweh, but the Ying to Sophia’s Yang – the luminescent Gods in Gnostic tradition generally had partners. Jesus came to Earth not to fulfill Yahweh’s will, but Sophia’s. Hence, the total change of the covenant from one of total control, laws, and punishment, to one of love and redemption.
As I recall, the Gnostics saw Jesus’s revelations as being as revealing to Yahweh as they were to mankind, and as a result, Yahweh has either moved up through the panoply of Gods and stopped being such a dick (having become more enlightened), or has been removed from power over the material realms altogether.
The one quibble that I have with the essay is that the author seemed to separate Gnosticism and Christianity as if they are two different things. The Gnostics were Christians, in that they believed Christ was divine and so forth. It is an odd sort of Christianity because it is not monotheistic (and really, given the trinity, is Christianity really monotheistic, anyway?), but it is Christianity, nonetheless, because they recognize Christ as true divinity and worship him as such. As Christianity is to Judaism, Gnosticism is to the Kaballah.