It’s not the material, it’s the delivery.

Here’s the set-up: In its understandable desire to make some hay out of Her Royal Clintonness’ email scandal, the RNC filed a FOIA request with the state department for a bunch of Clinton aide emails.

The state department came back with a response that it would get right on fulfilling the request, but that it would take about 75 years. Thank you for your patience.

Noting that it doesn’t normally take that long to forward some emails, a reporter asked a state department mouthpiece named Mark Toner to elucidate.

The State Department on Tuesday defended its estimate that it would take 75 years to fulfill a request from the Republican National Committee for emails of three top Hillary Clinton aides, and said that length of time is “not an outlandish estimation.”

“That is an incredible number,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner admitted. But he said the estimate is accurate because the RNC’s request is “very complex.”

I read that and had to wonder: Is the federal government now genetically engineering spokesvermin capable of making statements like that with straight faces? Because that would be an amazingly useful gift to breed into the next generation of stand-up comics, and if such an ability exists the industry should get right on it. I went looking for the video…

Nope. He couldn’t do it. He didn’t quite crack up, but he couldn’t hold a straight face.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to It’s not the material, it’s the delivery.

  1. czechsix says:

    Thanks for the pre-evening news blood pressure surge, Joel.

  2. anonymous says:

    75 years huh. Bet the guy who received immunity for his testimony on Hillary’s email server life span will be considerably shorter. Run Forrest Run !!!

  3. Kyle says:

    Hi myself(31) and my girlfriend(28) suck at politics so as a young unexperienced gen asking u a question… Hmm we were watching some of these videos of the states spokesman guy we have no idea what he does for the government we would like to know in lamens terms please? We do not like him or the way he speaks and address subjects so broadly with no actual reference to specific instances! And we hate how he always says “uhhh” all the time! So can u also explain in lamens terms why and what hillary has done wrong in lamens terms if possible thank you!
    Signed “tuaks original fan club #1”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *