They say that Louis XIV had the inscription Ultima Ratio Regum cast into all the cannon of the French Army. It means “The Ultimate Argument of Kings,” and that always struck me as one of the most honest and up-front things any ruler or would-be ruler ever said. “We can dress it up prettier than this, but when it comes down to the unvarnished truth this is what it’s about: You’ll do as I say or I’ll send my goons to kill you.”
I thought about that for a long time. If there’s an ultimate argument, it seems only logical that there must be an ultimate answer. For years I thought the ultimate answer must be the bullets in my rifle, but it never seemed quite right. I’ve got bullets – he’s got frigging Cannon Balls. I mean, if there were three hundred million rifles throwing bullets at him, then maybe. But we all know that’s not going to happen. So if there’s an ultimate answer to his ultimate argument, it sure as hell ain’t bullets.
It finally came to me – and that’s when I abandoned the city and most of my stuff, and gave all that was behind me a good stiff Randian Shrug.
The ultimate answer to kings is not a bullet, but a belly laugh.
What’s funny is that there’s nothing to prevent these jihad folks from joining the NRA, the evangelical church, or the PTA… The pundits would have a lot of propaganda ammunition if they did… but, so far, I can’t recall any of the jihadists who have even been part of the “anti-government” section of the American population, and zero connections have been mentioned to any sort of “militia” movement.
The dear leader’s propaganda people are certainly missing a bet here, especially if any of these attacks are “false flag.” What a bunch of maroooons.
Maroooons, indeed!
False flag or no, there’s an anti-rights agenda being pushed. It’s no longer just nudging.
What is it Paul Revere is to have yelled?
gfa
Wow, yeah. How many anti-government militiamen do you know who are also Arab Muslims like the apparent shooters here?
I mean, the militias I know of try to be inclusive and all, but …
I feel for the victims of this tragedy however I realize that in any free society this will happen. What is truly disturbing is the way the leaders are using this to advance their agendas This is just another example of the adage “There are no facts, there is no truth just data to be manipulated.”
I don’t know, MJR… such things MIGHT happen in a free society, but I suspect it would be incredibly rare – and not turn out anything like this one did.
There’s an old story here in Wyoming:
A guy comes into a bar, sticks his hand into his pocket and says he’s got a gun, demanding that the barkeep hand over the contents of the till.
He hears a polite cough from behind his back and turns to find six people pointing guns right at him. He glances back at the barkeeper, who is now holding a 12 g shotgun on him as well.
Barkeep says, “Do we draw straws or should we all shoot at once?”
The would be robber faints dead away.
One cowboy says, “He must not be from around here.” They all reholster, then resume talking and drinking their beer.
Pingback: There is no Truth | Situation - Hopeless But Not Serious
On my homepage yesterday there was an article from Reuters calling itself Factbox. It listed all the mass shootings in the country and there were a bunch on the list. It started back in 1998 with the Columbine shooting and comes to present with this San Bernadino thing. All totaled, including the shooters who were killed or committed suicide, there were just under 200 dead – TOTAL.
While I feel great sympathy for the victims and their families and realize that these shootings are tragedies for them, come on people…..LESS THAN 200 VICTIMS IN 16 YEARS. I’d bet that asprin has killed far more people than mass shootings have. That many people die daily in car accidents. Where’s the outrage? It just boggles my mind that these miniscule numbers can create such a panic.
“LESS THAN 200 VICTIMS IN 16 YEARS.”
Yes, I have noticed this too. It’s like a rustler starting a stampede, over nothing.
That’s why we have the media AKA the Ministry of Propaganda. The rulers find such events useful. They’d have to create them if they didn’t happen by themselves.
ML I’m not sure this will make sense but here goes… I agree with your comment that this sort of thing in a free society might happen, that was what I meant, I just failed to express myself correctly, my bad.
Unfortunately not all States are like Wyoming and the bar you talk about. The United States is (technically) a free society (don’t laugh) where there are 112.6 firearms per 100 residents.* As soon as the bad guys brandished their guns they should have been cut down but they weren’t. The blame for this failure to act falls on the Congressional Left, Academia and Media (CALMs).
The CLAMs are people who will move heaven and earth to ensure that they get as much power as they can. One of the ways they do this is to indoctrinate the public. They preach that it is wrong to defend oneself, wrong to even have a gun. In addition to the CLAMs the world is a dangerous place. There are a lot of organizations and countries around the globe that want to see harm come to the US. To these elements add the crazies your country has. BTW the US is not unique, my country (Canada) and all the other countries have their crazies too. Take all these factors together and the risks of these mass shootings increase. I just wish there were more places like the Wyoming bar you talk about, America would be a lot better off and I would have a place to go and be comfortable.
* https://www.atf.gov/file/89561/download
Hey Paul, Looks like the ministry of propaganda are increasing the nastiness. It appears that if this report can be believed they are trying the change the definition of mass shooting to inflate the numbers.
http://bearingarms.com/media-attempts-redefine-mass-shooting-order-inflate-number-attacks/
Come on down, MJR. Plenty of room here. 🙂 But don’t be fooled… we have far too many CLAMS right here in Wyoming. And people who accept and even support them. And, BTW, the “right wing” of this bird of prey is no better than the “left.” They both want total control of our lives and property.
Seems to me that the problem is that far, far too many people accept the “authority” of government to dictate just about anything and everything. Think about what the world would look like if people decided to ignore all that and take control of their own lives. Those in power get that power because most people allow it, or even benefit somehow from it – at the expense of others. Without that belief and all the rationalization that goes with it – without the compliance so necessary to the CLAMS’ schemes – involuntary government would collapse just about overnight. The only hard part about it is getting people to understand and take action on it.
I have no idea how to go about that, of course. It would seem that only a serious apocalypse of some kind could even hope to shatter the momentum of the involuntary government worship all over the world. I’d rather not go through that, of course, but I doubt we have any real choice.
ML one of these days I will visit the “Big Sky Country” of Wyoming, it’s on the bucket list. As for what to do against the CLAMs that’s simple, keep fighting them every chance you get just as I do with the Canadian equivalent. Oh, and keep your powder dry.