Don’t bother answering that, I already know. Children are bad for the environment, because they may grow up to be carnivores or even (gasp) entrepreneurs.
Unlike polar bears, which only eat baby seals alive.
“Act-Responsible” is apparently an advertising group, of all things.
Its goal is to federate, promote and inspire responsible communication on sustainability, equitable development and social responsibility. ACT shows how advertising professionals from all continents can use their core talent – creativity – to play a significant role in addressing today’s crucial world issues.
Personally I think ad executives seem to have lost their collective minds, right about the time they got tired of two ladies standing in a kitchen and rapturously discussing dish soap. As an example of their concern for “social issues,” the above ad – which was apparently aimed at some expo in Cannes last year – makes me wish they’d go back to hawking detergent. Now with Extra Phosphates!
Foamy the squirrel knows why environmentalists hate children.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upgS56ORpZQ
Some strong language. Quite a lot actually.
-S
Wow. These people are sick. Especially after that “commercial” with “non-believers” exploding into piles of bloody mush. I would invite them to take themselves out if they believe this garbage so strongly….
It’s not just the environmentalists that are targeting children, Seems that if a child is not perfect it is now an eugenic kindness of a loving parent to snuff off those cells and perchance you have the misfortune of birthing a “suffering” child a pillow over their face is a truly loving parental action too.
Suffering? just who the heck gets to decide what the definition of suffering is? As a family that has adopted so called un adoptables this is horrible superficial narcissistic rationalizing at it’s worst.
The lovely Virginia Ironside:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RAAhTL4Arg&feature=player_embedded