I don’t know which anger me more: the terrorists, their victims, or their victims’ protectors.

Seems reasonable…

In February, after the last round of jihad in Paris, I wrote a column calling on every Jewish man, woman, and child in Europe to get a gun and learn how to use it. I now wish to revise my statement: the goyim should get guns, too.

For some reason, this is still a controversial statement.

Yet somehow this simple and achievable task is not only not first on the to-do list, it’s blasphemy to even mention it. Instead we get this:

France Moves To Strip Citizens Of Civil Liberties After Paris Attacks

After a series of coordinated terrorist attacks left 129 dead in Paris Friday, Hollande immediately declared a state of emergency, based on a rarely used 1955 law that allows the state to conduct warrantless searches of private property, impose curfews, restrict public gatherings and movements of people, confiscate weapons at will and take over the press.

By law the state of emergency cannot last more than 12 days, but Hollande asked for a three-month extension Monday. He also proposed a series of constitutional amendments to increase the state’s surveillance powers and give it power to strip convicted terrorists and bi-nationals who commit hostile acts toward France of citizenship.

Of course he did. Further, the few who speak out against these common-sense measures will be shouted down if not jailed for the blasphemers they are.

And so it goes and so it will go, until at last we can all agree that Oceania is and has always been at war with EastMiddlia, and that’s why the bombs keep going off.

Depressing as hell, is what it is.

ETA: I’m not a huge Yankee Sheriff fan, I don’t find him all that funny or informative, but I can’t find anything to disagree with in this latest diatribe, courtesy of Weer’d.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to I don’t know which anger me more: the terrorists, their victims, or their victims’ protectors.

  1. Paul X says:

    “I don’t know which anger me more: the terrorists, their victims, or their victims’ protectors.”

    I don’t have any problem with that one. It’s the government protection racket. Disarming people is an act of war. What we saw in Paris was just the inevitable result of that.

    Both are excellent links, by the way.

  2. Mutti says:

    Apparently the EU finally had enough – and will be releasing a Draft Proposal to get rid of Semi-Automatics – that’ll teach them whose boss! (Maybe they will or maybe they won’t):

    https://ukshootingnews.wordpress.com/2015/11/17/the-eu-will-publish-a-total-semi-auto-rifle-ban-proposal-tomorrow/#comments

  3. Paul X says:

    Yeah, that’ll work…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *