Sure, sure. Anyway, why is this bullshit article calling the bullshit flying machine a “flying car” when it has nothing to do with wheels or roads? It’s a weird-ass ultralight, not a flying car. But editors don’t need to fact-check any more. They just, um…
Okay, I don’t know what editors do anymore.
The Opener BlackFly Is a Flying Car That Doesn’t Require a Pilot’s License
And this bullshit dreamy intro video isn’t helping reduce my skepticism…
Must say – I’d love to own a VTOL. But I’ll hold out for the invisible one that can go more than 40 miles on a charge. I’m sure that’ll be the next model.
Editors exist to ensure the stories that get through are in line with the owners’ views.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
They realize that their audience these days is largely hive dwellers who wait with open mouths in the bottom of an outhouse, begging for anything that comes their way.
If you have a drivers license and a pilots license with an auto gyro rating, your dream flying car, the PAL-V, is here. Oh, did I mention it’s half a million bucks to get one? Meh, it’s just a payment…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfEYry7-jww
If I saw that flying over my property I would most likely just shoot it down and claim I thought we were being invaded by aliens…or Californians.
Which is the same thing.
It’s gotta be cool, Sarek is flying one.
Moller has been taking people’s money for the last fifty years, and hasn’t yet brought a flying car to market. https://moller.com/moller_invest.html To keep him going that long, there must be many people out there willing to believe .
Myself, I believe that airplanes and cars are fundamentally different things (like pants and screwdrivers) and just don’t lend themselves to combination devices.