What’s weird about this is that gun grabbers are proven right about something.

They’ve always said it doesn’t matter if you’re all law-abiding and stuff. You still shouldn’t have guns because bad guys will get them and do bad things with them.

So…maybe feds shouldn’t have guns?

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The gun used in the seemingly random slaying of a woman on a San Francisco pier belonged to a federal agent, a law enforcement official briefed on the matter said Tuesday.

The official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the case and spoke on condition of anonymity, said a police check of the weapon’s serial number shows it belonged to a federal agent. The official declined to elaborate further.

The San Francisco Police Department, which is investigating the case, declined to comment.

Declined to comment? Imagine that.

My way-out-on-a-limb prediction: This will not become a big part of the story, even though it only shores up what the gungrabbers have been saying all along.

About Joel

You shouldn't ask these questions of a paranoid recluse, you know.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to What’s weird about this is that gun grabbers are proven right about something.

  1. MamaLiberty says:

    I can’t make up my mind whether to push for a total disarming of the feds, or just make them stop using public toilets…. We need to find out where and how they lose so many guns first!

    Never have figured out just why the source of the gun was as (or more) important to these idiots as the crime it was used for. Where the gun came from makes zero difference to the victim.

  2. Kentucky says:

    Letter to the local newspaper from a lady demanding that all the guns be seized because the guns used in crimes obviously came from legal owners.

    I submitted a letter asking her to produce documentation for that claim.

  3. Kentucky says:

    . . . and that was two weeks ago.

    So far, nothing but crickets, as I fully expected.

To the stake with the heretic!